Journal Information
Editorial
Full text access
Uncorrected Proof. Available online 23 June 2025
Ensuring breastfeeding equity has promise to help equalize early childhood development
Visits
32
Cecília Tomori
Corresponding author
ctomori1@jh.edu

Corresponding author.
Johns Hopkins School of Nursing and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

Early childhood development (ECD) is the cornerstone of our collective future – with lifelong impacts for health, wellbeing, educational attainment and economic participation.1 This is why ECD is a major global priority, and its embedded throughout the Sustainable Development Goals.2 To help children achieve their full potential, ECD must be supported by multi-sectorial, structural measures that address poverty, malnutrition, environmental harms, and inequities in access to healthcare and education, among others.1,3 Today, however, globally we face inequities that continue to limit children’s development and disproportionately affect children living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).4 Breastfeeding has powerful, life-long effects on child health and development.5 In their innovative new study, Ford et al.6 examine the role of exclusive breastfeeding as a potential moderator of developmental outcomes in a cohort of children drawn from Southeast Brazil whose mothers had unequal patterns of educational attainment. ECD was measured at 12 months via an in-person assessment using the Bayley-III validated scales. Since maternal education is a well-established determinant of ECD,7 the authors hypothesized that exclusive breastfeeding would have a protective effect for those children whose mothers have lower educational attainment.

In concert with previous findings, the study found that children of mothers with higher educational attainment had more optimal early childhood development, as reflected by cognitive, language and a composite Bayley Global Scores. Similarly, in line with prior literature, EBF was also associated with higher cognitive, language, and Bayley Global Scores. Notably, when the authors carried out a moderation analysis, they found that children of those with fewer years of schooling (under 10 years and between 10 and 12 years) but who were EBF attained higher cognitive and global scores than those who were not EBF. A sensitivity analysis further found a medium effect size for the cognitive scores and a large effect size for the global scores among those with the fewest years of schooling (under 10 years).

These are important findings because they show that EBF has a protective impact for children whose mothers face educational disadvantages. This reinforces the importance of breastfeeding for developmental outcomes and for ensuring positive outcomes across the life course, especially for children who may face early disadvantages. EBF confers nutritional advantages as well as opportunities for mothers and infants to interact and facilitates responsive, nurturing care that leads to healthy development.5 Breastmilk is a living substance that exists within the context of the dynamic feedback loops of the breastfeeding relationship.5 Importantly, breastfeeding is a complex package of evolutionary adaptations that encompasses all of these biopsychosocial elements and many more.5 The study ultimately reinforces that breastfeeding is a matter of ensuring intergenerational health equity and scaling up support for it should be of central concern for governments.

The 2023 Lancet Breastfeeding Series documented that while most women want to breastfeed, they are unable to do so due to numerous structural and social barriers.5 Key among these are practices in the health system that fail to adequately support breastfeeding, workplaces that do not provide adequate leave and supportive environments for breastfeeding, and aggressive marketing tactics by the formula industry that undermine breastfeeding by misleading caregivers, target health professionals and shape the policy environment.5 Together, these barriers make it difficult to make informed decisions about infant feeding, initiate breastfeeding in a timely manner after birth, sustain exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months and to continue it with complementary foods for 2 years as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Substantial positive changes have been achieved in Brazil over the last 20+ years in early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF at six months, and continued breastfeeding at 1 and 2 years.8 Yet, breastfeeding outcomes still fall considerably short of 2030 targets. Indeed, Brazil’s national EBF rate in 2019 was 45.8 %.8 Although the Southeast region of Brazil from where this cohort hails had higher EBF rates in 2019 at 49.1 %, it would still need to significantly increase these rates to meet 2030 goals of 70 %.8 In this cohort, which was born in 2022 and impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors note that EBF rates were lower at 37.92 % than the previously collected national and regional averages.

The authors note that a driver of these lower EBF rates may be economic pressures compounded by the pandemic, which forced those especially from lower socioeconomic groups to enter work environments that were less accommodating for breastfeeding.9 This highlights the importance of structural support in the workplace for breastfeeding, particularly for those working in the informal sector and low-wage jobs.5 Greater educational attainment may mean better economic opportunities and more flexibility to find a workplace that is supportive of breastfeeding.10 Although we do not have data on the work environments of the participants, those with lower educational attainment had lower EBF rates (28.6 % for mothers with < 10 yrs, 36.5 % for those 10–12 yrs and 43.5 % for those with >12 years of education, respectively). Moreover, while women in Brazil have made significant progress in educational attainment, their earnings are still significantly lower across all levels.11 The Equal Pay Law enacted in 2023 to address the gender wage gap may help to address these inequities.12

The health system is another major driver of these lower EBF rates.5 The authors mention the importance of the implementation BFHI in Brazil. A key challenge has been the stagnating number of BFHI hospitals, and uneven implementation of the 10 steps that are part of the BFHI.13 Moreover, breastfeeding supportive hospital practices and direct support services were frequently disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic,14,15 which may have also had an influence for this cohort. An area of further study would be to examine ECD in relation to the trajectory of breastfeeding experiences and early breastfeeding outcomes, taking into account BFHI practices and COVID-19 policies, and the socioeconomic status and educational attainment of mothers.

Although Brazil has strong protections for breastfeeding, and has endorsed the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes (the Code), it has also witnessed significant rise in commercial milk formula consumption in the past two decades.16 This is due to persistent corporate political activities and aggressive marketing efforts that target families, health professionals and their organizations, and government policymakers.16 These tactics are pervasive globally and constitute the commercial milk formula playbook that is deployed to generate profits at a high cost for public health and health equity.17 Another avenue for further investigation is the exposure and impact of these marketing practices by educational status with downstream impacts for ECD.

For most major drivers of EBF inequities are well documented along the lines of maternal socioeconomic status, and educational attainment is a key component of SES. So, while EBF can help buffer the relationship of educational attainment and ECD, the ability to EBF for 6 months may itself be constrained by these structural barriers. In agreement with the authors, longitudinal studies will be needed to untangle these complex relationships with confounders and to determine causality. Further governmental investment and multi-sectorial collaboration are necessary to help remove these structural barriers to create enabling environments for breastfeeding that are equitable across the social spectrum.5 Women should have the opportunity to fully participate in education, earn equitable pay, and be supported in their breastfeeding journeys in the health system, workplace, and beyond–which in turn impacts their children’s development, health and wellbeing. Together, these findings reinforce that governmental support for gender equity and breastfeeding matters for mothers and their children–and ultimately all families and communities across generations.

References
[1]
L.M. Richter, B. Daelmans, J. Lombardi, J. Heymann, F.L. Boo, J.R. Behrman, et al.
Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development.
Lancet, 389 (2017), pp. 103-108
[2]
L.M. Richter, C. Cappa, G. Issa, C. Lu, N. Petrowski, S.N. Naicker.
Data for action on early childhood development.
Lancet, 396 (2020), pp. 1784-1786
[3]
E. Vargas-Barón, K. Diehl, J.W. Small.
Improving policy environments for infants and young children: global status of multisectoral national policies for early childhood development.
Vuln Child Youth Stud, 17 (2022), pp. 193-209
[4]
C. Lu, J. Cuartas, G. Fink, D. McCoy, K. Liu, Z. Li, et al.
Inequalities in early childhood care and development in low/middle-income countries: 2010-2018.
BMJ Glob Health, 5 (2020),
[5]
R. Pérez-Escamilla, C. Tomori, S. Hernández-Cordero, P. Baker, A.J. Barros, F. Bégin, et al.
Breastfeeding: crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world.
[6]
L.A. Ford, G. Buccini, A.C. Saragosa, I.A. Martins, J.M. Moreira, S.M. Lemos, et al.
Exclusive breastfeeding modifies the association between maternal education and child development: a cross-sectional study nested in a cohort.
[7]
M.M. Black, S.P. Walker, L.C. Fernald, C.T. Andersen, A.M. DiGirolamo, C. Lu, et al.
Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course.
[8]
C.S. Boccolini, E.M. Lacerda, N. Bertoni, N. Oliveira, N.H. Alves-Santos, D.R. Farias, et al.
Trends of breastfeeding indicators in Brazil from 1996 to 2019 and the gaps to achieve the WHO/UNICEF 2030 targets.
BMJ Glob Health, 8 (2023),
[9]
B.L. Holand, C. de Oliveira Agostini, M.C. Pacheco, D.M. de Leon, M. Drehmer, V.L. Bosa.
Association between breastfeeding and complementary feeding in pre-pandemic and pandemic COVID-19 times: maternar cohort study.
J Pediatr (Rio J), 98 (2022), pp. 496-503
[10]
M. Vilar-Compte, S. Hernández-Cordero, M. Ancira-Moreno, S. Burrola-Méndez, I. Ferre-Eguiluz, I. Omaña, et al.
Breastfeeding at the workplace: a systematic review of interventions to improve workplace environments to facilitate breastfeeding among working women.
Int J Equity Health, 20 (2021), pp. 110
[11]
Inter-Trade Union Department of Statistics and Socioeconomic Studies (DIESSE).
A Lei da Igualdade salarial entre homens e mulheres.
[12]
International Labour Organization. More Countries Affirm Support For Ending the Gender Pay Gap By 2030 [cited June 13, 2025]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/more-countries-affirm-support-ending-gender-pay-gap-2030.
[13]
J.A. Lamounier, L.B. Santiago, M.C. Romano, R.P. Da Silva, R.G. Araújo, R.G Chaves.
Public health policies and breastfeeding: outcomes related to the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative in Brazil.
World Nutr, 12 (2021), pp. 83-135
[14]
W. Lubbe, H. Niela-Vilén, G. Thomson, E. Botha.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on breastfeeding support services and women's experiences of breastfeeding: a review.
Int J Womens Health, 14 (2022), pp. 1447-1457
[15]
WA Gonçalves-Ferri, F.M. Pereira-Cellini, K. Coca, D.C. Aragon, P. Nader, J.C. Lyra, et al.
The impact of coronavirus outbreak on breastfeeding guidelines among Brazilian hospitals and maternity services: a cross-sectional study.
Int Breastfeed J, 16 (2021), pp. 30
[16]
C.A. Robles, M. Mialon, L.A. Mais, D. Neri, K.C. Silva, P. Baker.
Breastfeeding, first-food systems and corporate power: a case study on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry in Brazil.
Global Health, 20 (2024), pp. 12
[17]
N. Rollins, E. Piwoz, P. Baker, G. Kingston, K.M. Mabaso, D. McCoy, et al.
Marketing of commercial milk formula: a system to capture parents, communities, science, and policy.
Download PDF
Idiomas
Jornal de Pediatria (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
en pt
Taxa de publicaçao Publication fee
A partir de 10 de fevereiro de 2025, haverá mudança no preço da taxa de publicação de todos os artigos que forem aceitos para publicação no Jornal de Pediatria. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a esta revista, os autores concordam com esses termos. A submissão dos manuscritos continua gratuita. Effective February 10, 2025, there will be changes in the Article Publishing Charge (APC) for all articles after peer review and acceptance in Jornal de Pediatria. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. Manuscript submission remains free of charge.
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.